Zapier vs Make.com

Zapier is easier. Make is more powerful. Here's how to choose.

The Quick Answer

Choose Zapier if: You want the simplest setup, need the most integrations, have simple linear workflows, or your team will maintain it themselves.

Choose Make.com if: You need complex logic (branching, loops, error handling), want better pricing at volume, or have multi-step workflows with conditionals.

Pricing Comparison

Zapier

Free: 100 tasks/month, 5 Zaps

Starter: $19.99/month for 750 tasks

Professional: $49/month for 2,000 tasks

Key point: Counts every action as a task. A 5-step workflow uses 5 tasks per run.

Make.com

Free: 1,000 operations/month

Core: $9/month for 10,000 operations

Pro: $16/month for 10,000 operations

Key point: 10x+ more operations for similar price. Significantly cheaper at scale.

Feature Comparison

  • Ease of use: Zapier wins. Simpler interface, more hand-holding.
  • Integrations: Zapier has 5,000+. Make has 1,000+ but covers most needs.
  • Complex workflows: Make wins. Visual branching, better error handling, loops.
  • Pricing: Make wins at any meaningful volume.
  • Support: Both good. Zapier has more documentation.

My Recommendation

For most business automation: Make.com. The pricing is better, the visual workflow builder is more powerful, and it handles complexity well.

For simple, team-maintained automations: Zapier. If your marketing team needs to connect two apps and you want them to do it themselves, Zapier's simplicity wins.

For high-volume or complex needs: n8n (self-hosted). Neither Zapier nor Make makes sense when you're running thousands of operations daily.

Need Help Deciding?

I'll assess your specific needs and recommend the right platform.