← Back to Writing

How I Built A System That Processes 3,000 Products A Month (And Why It Took 6 Months)

The biggest automation project I've ever built almost didn't happen.

CR Deals Cincinnati is an auction and resale operation. They move 1,500 to 3,000 products every month. Everything from furniture to electronics to random household items.

When they came to me, they were drowning in manual work. Taking photos, writing descriptions, posting to multiple platforms, managing inventory across channels.

They needed something I'd never built before. An enterprise-grade AI system that could handle thousands of products autonomously.

I wasn't sure I could pull it off.

The Actual Problem

Here's what their workflow looked like before automation.

Product comes in. Take photos. Research comparable prices across multiple marketplaces. Write descriptions. Post to their website. Post to Facebook. Post to other platforms. Track inventory. Update pricing. Manage everything manually.

For 50 to 100 products every single day.

They had people working full time just managing product listings. And they still couldn't keep up.

The bottleneck was killing their ability to scale. They could source more products, but they couldn't process them fast enough to make it worth it.

What I Built

The system I built handles the entire product workflow autonomously.

AI-powered market intelligence pulls pricing data from comparable products across platforms. GPT-4 generates product descriptions, titles, and tags automatically. The system posts to their website, Facebook, and other channels simultaneously.

Real-time inventory sync across all platforms. Automated pricing updates based on market conditions. Everything runs 24/7 without human intervention.

It processes 50 to 100 products daily. That's 3,000 products a month running completely automatically.

Why It Took Six Months

This wasn't a simple automation. This was building an entire operational system from scratch.

The technical challenges were real. Connecting to multiple marketplaces, each with different APIs and requirements. Building AI prompts that generated consistent, high-quality descriptions. Creating logic that could handle pricing decisions intelligently.

But the bigger challenge was understanding their business well enough to build the right system.

I spent weeks just observing their workflow. What decisions do they make when pricing a product? How do they write descriptions that convert? What information matters most to buyers?

Then building it in phases. Start with product intake. Get that working. Then add description generation. Get that working. Then multi-platform posting.

Each phase required testing with real products, finding edge cases, refining the logic.

You can't rush that. You have to build it right.

The Numbers That Matter

The system saves them 1,040+ hours annually. That's $52K in labor costs they're not spending on manual product management.

But the real value is capacity. Before automation, they were capped at maybe 2,000 products a month before quality started degrading. Now they can handle 3,000+ with room to scale further.

That's not just cost savings. That's revenue they couldn't access before because they couldn't process enough inventory.

What I Learned

You can't build enterprise systems fast. You shouldn't try.

I've seen consultants promise to build complex systems in two weeks. They're either lying or building garbage.

Real systems take time. You need to understand the business. Build in phases. Test thoroughly. Handle edge cases. Document everything.

This project took six months from discovery to full deployment. That's not because I'm slow. That's because building something that processes thousands of products autonomously requires getting it right.

The client understood that. They were patient. They participated in testing. They gave feedback throughout.

That's why it works now.

The Part I'm Proud Of

The system runs 24/7 without supervision. They can drop off a truckload of products, and by the next day everything is photographed, priced, described, and listed across multiple platforms.

No manual intervention. No quality degradation. Just consistent, reliable processing.

That's the difference between automation that sort of works and automation that actually replaces entire workflows.

I built something that doesn't just save time. It fundamentally changed their operational capacity.

That's what I'm trying to do with every project now. Not just make things faster. Make things possible that weren't before.